The Christian conviction that Christ conquered death began with the
proclamation of the disciples, who along with numerous other
witnesses, including Saul of Tarsus who later became the Apostle Paul,
claimed to have seen and conversed with the risen Christ.
The resurrection of Christ is viewed by Christians as the vindication
of Christ's teaching concerning himself and a validation of his
mission of redemption. By his resurrection, Christ defeated sin and
death and fulfilled the original calling of Israel to be "a light to
the nations".
The late Bruce Metzger, a renowned New Testament scholar at Princeton
and an expert in textual criticism stated,
"The evidence for the resurrection of Jesus Christ is
overwhelming. Nothing in history is more certain than that the
disciples believed that, after being crucified, dead, and buried,
Christ rose again from the tomb on the third day, and that at
intervals thereafter he met and conversed with them. . . . It is
simply inconceivable that the scattered and disheartened remnant
(Jesus" disciples) could have found a rallying point and a gospel in
the memory of him who had been put to death as a criminal, had they
not been convinced that God owned him and accredited his mission by
raising him from the dead." 1
Contemporary Authorities on the Resurrection
For me to write about Christ's resurrection is redundant in that so
much material has already been written by scholars and authorities far
more qualified than I am. You can reference some the best work on this
subject by scholars and authors such as:
- N.T. Wright—Renowned New Testament scholar and former
Bishop of Durham, England. He was Research Professor of New
Testament and Early Christianity at St Mary's College in the
University of St Andrews in Scotland until 2019, when he became a
senior research fellow at Oxford University. His book, The
Resurrection of the Son of God, is considered by many clergy
and theologians to be a seminal Christian work on the resurrection
of the historical Jesus. (See https://ntwrightpage.com.)
- William Lane Craig— Research Professor of Philosophy at
Talbot School of Theology and Professor of Philosophy at Houston
Baptist University. Wheaton College (B.A. 1971) and graduate studies
at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (M.A. 1974; M.A. 1975), the
University of Birmingham (England) (Ph.D. 1977), and the University
of Munich (Germany) (D.Theol. 1984). He is best known as a
philosopher, apologist, and debater, but has also authored many
articles and publications. (See https://reasonablefaith.org.)
- Dr. Gary R. Habermas—Distinguished Professor and Chair of
the Dept. of Philosophy and Theology at Liberty University. (M.A. in
Philosophy and World Religions, University of Detroit, Ph.D.
Michigan State University) He has authored, co-authored, and edited
40 books and publications on philosophy and theology with a
specialization in the resurrection of Christ. For information,
articles and a list of publications, see https://garyhabermas.com.)
On the popular level, JND Anderson's Christianity: The Witness of
History, (IVP Press) provides a discussion of the historical
foundations of the Christian faith including the evidence for the
resurrection. In addition, Timothy Keller's The Reason for God:
Belief in an Age of Skepticism covers questions most often posed
by skeptics and also covers evidence for the resurrection.
A Brief Summary of the Evidence for the Resurrection
The following points are explained in depth in the writings of the
scholars and authors previously cited.
- The disciples proclaimed Jesus as the risen Messiah very shortly
after his crucifixion in Jerusalem, the very city in which it had
occurred. Therefore, there was no time for elaborate myths to
develop. If Jesus was still in the grave, the Jewish authorities
could have quickly disproved the apostles' claim. Of course, they
accused the apostles of stealing Jesus body and perpetrating a hoax.
However, many of the apostles were executed by the Roman authorities
for proclaiming Jesus as a King more ultimate than Caesar.
(Tradition indicates that Peter met his death by crucifixion in a
head down position. Paul languished in a Roman prison and was most
likely executed in Rome.) Could these men, who were willing to die
for the Gospel of Christ, have perpetrated a deliberate fraud? That
seems psychologically unlikely. Skeptics would at least have to
admit that the disciples genuinely believed that Christ had risen
from death.
- All the first Christians were Jews who were strict monotheists.
They viewed the coming Messiah as a great military leader and king
who would overthrow the Roman occupiers and make all the nations
acknowledge his authority. The idea of a dying and rising Messiah
was totally unexpected. When Jesus told his disciples about his
coming crucifixion, they could not grasp what he was saying. When
Jesus was tried by the Sanhedrin (the Jewish council) and condemned
to death, his disciples were shocked and in despair. They hid for
fear of the Jewish authorities. What changed these despairing and
frightened disciples into bold witnesses of Christ's resurrection
just a few weeks later?
- In Paul's first letter to the Christians at Corinth, he cites a
list of witnesses to whom the risen Christ appeared. He stated that
the list of witnesses, came from reliable sources.
"For I delivered to you as of first importance what I
also received; that Christ died for our sins in accordance with
the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the
third day in accordance with the Scriptures, that he appeared to
Cephas, then to the twelve. The he appeared to more than five
hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though
some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all
the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared
also to me." (I Cor. 15:3‐8)
Biblical scholars regard Paul's letter to the Corinthians as
authentic. It was written just 15 to 20 years after the death of
Jesus. In the passage quoted previously, Paul mentions the
resurrection and, by implication, the empty tomb, which occurred on
the "third day". As Tim Keller points out, Paul is writing about an
historical event that occurred in space and time. He also mentions
several groups of witnesses in a list that was passed down as
reliable tradition and that was carefully preserved.2
- Skeptics have often concluded that the disciples were sincere but
must have hallucinated Jesus appearances. It is surmised that their
grief and sadness brought on visions or hallucinations, which led
them to believe that Jesus was in some way spiritually alive and
that his teachings would live on. However, it is extremely unlikely
that several people in different places and at different times could
have the same hallucination. Referring back to Paul's list, he
mentions more than five hundred people who saw the risen Christ at
one time. Then there is the fact that as Jews, the disciples did not
expect Jesus' resurrection and were in despair over his death. They
had expected him to assume power and inaugurate the Kingdom of God
on earth right away. When that did not happen, they viewed it as a
defeat. Finally, because Christ had identified Himself as the
Messiah and yet was crucified, how could they continue to believe
his claim? It was only the resurrection that turned them into bold
witnesses that proclaimed Christ as the risen savior and Israel's
Messiah.
- Saul of Tarsus, a Pharisee and a persecutor of the Christian
movement, was later converted in a dramatic encounter with the risen
Christ on the road to Damascus. He became an apostle and one of the
greatest early Christian missionaries. His letters to various
churches are included in the New Testament. Years later, after his
missionary journeys across Asia Minor, he was arrested in Jerusalem,
and upon appealing to Caesar (as a Roman citizen), was to be sent to
Rome for trial. While Paul was being held in the city of Caesarea,
the king of Palestine, Herod Agrippa was curious about Paul's case
and asked Paul to appear before him. This gave Paul an opportunity
to explain his conversion experience and the suffering and rising
again of Christ. Paul stated, "For the king knows about these
things, and to him I speak freely; for I am persuaded that none of
these things (referring to Christ's life, arrest, and execution) has
escaped his notice, for this was not done in a corner." (Acts 26:26)
Paul was appealing to events that were common knowledge to people
residing in Palestine at that time.
- The Apostles cross-validated their experiences as witnesses of
Christ's resurrection. As mentioned previously, the idea that they
could have fabricated the account of the resurrection or deceived
one another is unbelievable. Peter was an eyewitness of the trial
and crucifixion of Christ, the empty tomb, and the appearances of
the resurrected Christ. He certainly spoke at length with Paul and
some of the other apostles in Jerusalem during the first church
council concerning what was required of the Gentile (non-Jewish)
converts. Paul, Peter, James and others had many conversations about
Jesus's life and teachings, his death, and his resurrection.
_______________________
Footnotes
1Bruce Metzger, The New Testament: Its Background,
Growth, and Content, Abington Press, Nashville and New York,
1965, pp 126 ‐ 127.
2Keller, Timothy, The Reason for God: Belief in an Age
of Skepticism, Riverhead Books, 2008, p. 212.
Back to Home Page